Values and metaphors get all the love.

As a communications researcher who works with experts and advocates on framing I have learned that people love metaphors. They love to hear about them, think about them, use them, and yes, critique them. FrameWorks’ explanatory metaphors frequently steal the show and overshadow the importance of the messages that we are trying to communicate. Values, as a frame element, are also subject to this same “shiny thing” problem. And I guess that all of this focus on the mechanism—the how in the translation process—isn’t a bad thing. These tools and recommendations do, after all, represent the culmination of the communication process. It’s good that they get so much love because this frequently translates into people using them.

But I want to rewind for a second and tell you about the most important (and frequently most difficult) part of communications research—synthesizing and distilling the information that needs to be translated. It is, after all, impossible for a piece of translational work to be effective without something to translate.

Distilling the “untranslated story” (the object that frames seek to “pass” to the public) is the beginning of the iterative process of Strategic Frame Analysis™. During this work, FrameWorks researchers interview experts, attend meetings, read literature and feed data back to experts for checks, refinements, and consensus. The result of this process is a set of messages that experts and advocates want people to be able to understand and have access to as they go about their daily lives and make decisions as citizens. I want to argue that this untranslated story is the unsung hero of our communications research and deserves a little more love.

nat_1

I have spent the past week distilling an untranslated story with a group of leading scientists, practitioners, and organizational thinkers who work on issues of mental health and well-being in the Rhineland-Palatinate region of Germany. They are doctors, therapists, nurses and managers who work at the Pfalzklinikum fuer Psychiatrie und Neurologie—a mental health clinic and community service provider in a largely rural (and unbelievably beautiful) German state. Over the course of the week, and the months that preceded it, this group has been reading, thinking, debating, and composing a story about the power of prevention which they want members of the public and their policy makers to be able to understand and use. The goal of their work is to shift the focus and resources of systems, programs, and policies from remedial and reactive approaches of dealing with illness, to preventative approaches that deal in wellness. Their story positions building resilience, at individual, organizational, and systems levels as the lever through which to achieve this reorientation. This is complex stuff, but the team, after much debate, has managed to synthesize a wide range of literatures and perspectives into a set of 10 core messages—a story to be translated through the design and testing of those coveted metaphors and values.

{ 1 comment }

Communicating Complexity

by Nat Kendall-Taylor September 9, 2014 Uncategorized

In his 2001 song, Mississippi, Bob Dylan sang, “You can always go back but you can’t go back all the way.” Bob Dylan is famously a lot of things to a lot of people, but who knew he was a science translator? In this one sentence, Dylan captured the essence of the science of early [...]

0 comments Read more →

Stress—Its’ Not That Simple

by Nat Kendall-Taylor September 2, 2014 Uncategorized

NPR recently ran a weeklong series on stress. It was a concentrated dose of a broader public conversation that’s been going on about the science of stress. The series mentioned, but could have done more to emphasize, that not all stress is created equal. I want to pause and consider the issue from a communications [...]

Read more →

Instead of Arguing About Whether Climate Change is Real, Change the Story

by Alexis Bunten August 25, 2014 Uncategorized

In a recent Bill Moyers interview, David Suzuki talked about how he was able to bridge the divide between environmentalists and loggers on the issue of climate change. Instead of arguing about whether climate change is real, Suzuki explained that environmental communicators need to change the story by starting from a common ground — that [...]

Read more →

Facts, Frames, and the Fight Over Immigration

by Adam Simon August 18, 2014 Uncategorized

A recent article in the Washington Post details results from a Gallup poll which found a statistically distinguishable seven percent drop in Americans’ support for increasing immigration. Crucially, the article shows that this drop is not attributable to changes in the number of immigrants in the United States or the U.S. unemployment rate.[i] So what [...]

Read more →

Bringing the “Science of Communication” to Criminal Justice Advocacy

by Frank Gilliam August 4, 2014 Uncategorized

When criminal justice advocates gather in Martha’s Vineyard this August to reflect on the progress of, and challenges to, their advocacy, they will have the benefit of new communications science research. For the last four years I have been part of a group of social scientists, lawyers and practitioners – led by the Charles Hamilton [...]

Read more →

Talking Criminal Justice Reform

by Susan Bales July 31, 2014 Uncategorized

Criminal justice reform advocates are cautiously optimistic that their day in court may have arrived at long last. While many other progressive issues appear to be at a standstill (witness immigration reform, climate change, etc.), criminal justice issues appear to have the wind at their back. From the Department of Justice to the National Academy [...]

1 comment Read more →

Neuroscience is Hot

by Nat Kendall-Taylor July 17, 2014 Uncategorized

Dive into almost any issue in the news these days and it won’t take long to find a neuroscience angle. Morality has roots in the brain. Adolescence is best understood by what is not yet in the brain. The ebbs and flows of the stock market are tied to neural activations. And even the difference [...]

Read more →

Making Connections: What the Science of Early Childhood Development Has to Tell us About Adult Addiction

by Nat Kendall-Taylor July 10, 2014 Uncategorized

There is a lot in the news these days about child development, with proposals to improve early learning in the US moving up the national agenda. There has also been some recent attention paid in the news media to the issue of addiction, with discussion of new treatment approaches. While these two issues are in [...]

Read more →

Resilience: The Buzz on Bouncing Back

by Nat Kendall-Taylor July 7, 2014 Uncategorized

These days it’s hard to avoid the term “resilience.” Communities are “resilient,” countries are “resilient,” leaders are “resilient,” and yes, soccer teams are as well.  And I’d wager that almost anything you come across in the popular media these days about child development is strewn with “resilience.” But what does it mean to say something [...]

Read more →