By Susan Nall Bales, October 2002
ELEPHANTS! ELEPHANTS!
A little opinion research can be a dangerous thing. That's especially true when it leads people to confuse the research with the message. We suspect that's what happened to CDC's Mark Rosenberg in commenting on the release of the WHO Report on Global Violence, as reported in the Washington Post:
"Here, they're saying there are patterns in common in various types of violence all around the world, and that we have the goods to prevent it all around the world."
WHO Report Details Global Violence, The Washington Post, October 3, 2002, A16
How many frame problems can you name, veteran Kids Counters?
One, he begins by reminding us of the dominant frame in order to then rebut it — an "elephants" problem (see Ezine, "Don't Talk About Elephants: Avoid This Trap in Your Communications). Being fast and frugal cognators, we are appreciative to the speaker for having reminded us of what we thought all along so we can process this thought and go back to our laundry. End of conversation.
Two, he has confused the problem for the solution. This happens to many smart people who invest in public opinion research but don't go the added step of figuring out how to reframe in order to get people to see a different perspective. The truth - neither the policy solution nor the public opinion perception — will set people free unless subjected to a translation process: reframing.
Third, he thinks he has to acknowledge where people are in order to engage them or get them to learn the issue in a different way. Salience is not reframing. The fact that they think of the issue this way does not mean you need to re-invigorate it; quite the opposite.
MORE IN THE "IT'S ABOUT" HALL OF FAME
This great example comes via our own Don Crary who just couldn't resist pointing out how this debate is being framed:
(c) 2001 twincities and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
LEVEL ONE AND METAPHORS
There are a lot of framing lessons to be derived from the soundbite wars in an article about mountain bikers in California ("Mountain Bikers Up Against Calif. Conservationists, The Washington Post, October 2, 2002, A3).
What's the strategy in this quote?:
Good Level Ones, don't you think? Stewardship, tolerance (hate/prejudice). Good metaphorical set-up: you can't judge us all by the one bad example. And, more subtly, an erosion of mountain biking as a public problem; in effect, Bell is saying: is this really where you want to spend your attention, or are there more important issues that require your attention? And, finally, a displacement of responsibility: you should be focusing on those guys that hate us, not us. Not bad for a quick quote.
Even better is a quote from Gary Sprung, director of a mountain biking group:
Apart from an unfortunate construct (stating the offending metaphor first), this is a great attempt to reframe via metaphor.
In fact, this entire article probably merits a read, as a lot of think time went in to the framing of the two sides. A good discussion piece for Framing Fridays.
COWS! COWS!
Question: When is a concern not an issue?
Answer: When it's framed with vivid case examples that assign responsibility to individuals.
Democrats, take note!
The Washington Post reports that Democrats are puzzled by the fact that the economy has not emerged as the trump card it was trumped to be in recent polls ("Economy a Concern, Not an Issue," October 2, 2002, A4). With corporate scandals right and left, declining stock portfolios, etc., why isn't corporate greed sticking as a political issue?
Leave it to a smart Republican to figure out the framing mistake:
If the villain is Andrew Fastow, and we learn all the intricacies of how he did it, will we hold Congress, the President, the economic system accountable? Try reasoning within the frame and see if you can connect the dots. For more on the cows problem, check out FrameWorks' new "Framing Children's Issues" CD-Rom, or the section on "Context" in your FrameWorks Toolkit.
THOSE "O SO WISE" POLITICAL CARTOONS
Political cartoonist Tom Toles again reveals in its starkest terms the political strategy of naming and framing Level Ones (Thursday, The Washington Post October 3, 2002, A18). In this cartoon, the UN announces to Bush that he can no longer "hang this tag" on it - and the tag reads IRRELEVANT. Bush reaches into his desk drawer and pulls out another label: EVIL. In the subscript, the UN says "it's like you were ready," to which Bush replies, "I have a lot of those." Get those Level Ones ready, veteran framers! I have a feeling we're going to need them.
Over and out.