| |
About
This CD
This CD offers a collection of key documents from the FrameWorks
Institute's research on how Minnesotans view transitional jobs programs,
based on research conducted in that state in late 2004 and early
2005 for Lifetrack Resources, and supported by a grant from the
Joyce Foundation. As a result of this research, the FrameWorks Institute
also offers a series of communications recommendations for engaging
the public and a wide array of exemplary materials that incorporate
and model the communications findings. These materials are designed
to provide those who communicate about transitional jobs with a
useful “rough draft” from which they can refine their
own specific materials.
The goal of this work is not to supplant or substitute popular messages
for needed remedies and proven policies but rather to translate
those policies that service providers, advocates and policy experts
believe will improve outcomes for people who face serious barriers
to employment. Its ultimate destination is the wide array of groups
and individuals who wish to elevate the importance of transitional
jobs programs with community stakeholders, voters and policymakers.
To that end, this CD includes not only the foundational research
on public attitudes but also applications materials that model the
translation process necessary to engage the public in solutions.
By identifying specific practices that research suggests would advance
public understanding as well as those that are likely to impede
it, the applications section of this CD is intended to help experts
and advocates advance the public dialogue.
The research and materials included on this disk reflect the perspective
of strategic frame analysis, a multi-disciplinary multi-method approach
to communications about social issues pioneered by the FrameWorks
Institute and its research partners. Put simply, the way the news
is "framed" on many issues sets up habits of thought and
expectation that, over time, are so powerful that they serve to
configure new information to conform to this dominant frame. When
policy experts, community leaders, service organizations and advocacy
groups communicate to their constituencies and potential supporters,
they have options to repeat or break these dominant frames of discourse.
Understanding which frames serve to advance which policy options
with which groups becomes central to any movement's strategy. The
literature of social movements suggests that the prudent choice
of frames, and the ability to effectively contest the opposition's
frames, lie at the heart of successful policy advocacy. A more extensive
description of strategic frame analysis is available at www.frameworksinstitute.org.
Included on this CD are analyses of all research conducted in Minnesota;
we strongly urge those who would reshape public opinion to read
these documents carefully. Of interest as well is the wide array
of additional research conducted by the FrameWorks research team
on such related issues as work, government and race; this work is
regularly posted to the FrameWorks website.
A new FrameWorks Message Memo offers insights across the research
and makes specific recommendations about communications "do's"
and "don'ts".
The Applications section includes model op/eds and responses to
typical interview questions – all incorporating the FrameWorks
message suggestions. Of special interest is a series of Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQs) in which common answers are subjected to
framing analysis and better answers suggested, all with reference
to the research results. To keep the learning going, a section on
Resources offers more about framing.
©
FrameWorks Institute 2005. Standard rules of attribution and usage
apply as to any intellectual property.
Got questions? info@frameworksinstitute.org
|
|