This English-language Field Frame Analysis maps the competing narratives used by influential organizations to frame the debate on early child development and violence, especially violence related to early childhood. It finds that narratives of early child development are siloed and distinct with little attention given to the cognitive process of development. Organizations that communicate about violence, on the other hand, focus on one single dominant narrative, thereby missing opportunities to explore the breadth of the issue. The report concludes with recommendations as to how organizations working on these issues can use lessons from other phases of this project to communicate more effectively.
Countries
Brazil
Related content
Webinar
Climate and Children’s Learning & Development Webinar
What are the mindsets that block--and facilitate--people's engagement with climate change as a children's issue? How can framing help us move this issue up the agenda, build support for...
Webinar
Framing for change: how the science of communication can help you communicate science
The choices that we make in how we position our ideas can be the difference of cutting through and opening up space for people to consider new ideas, and having our messages rejected. Using...
Presentation
Let’s get our words right: how to craft messages that drive child abuse prevention
Three cultural mindsets--deep and powerful understandings used to make sense of social issues--are blocking prevention efforts on child abuse and across a broader range of social issues....