This English-language Field Frame Analysis maps the competing narratives used by influential organizations to frame the debate on early child development and violence, especially violence related to early childhood. It finds that narratives of early child development are siloed and distinct with little attention given to the cognitive process of development. Organizations that communicate about violence, on the other hand, focus on one single dominant narrative, thereby missing opportunities to explore the breadth of the issue. The report concludes with recommendations as to how organizations working on these issues can use lessons from other phases of this project to communicate more effectively.
Countries
Brazil
Related content
Report
Framing Adversity, Trauma, and Resilience
The science of adversity, trauma, and resilience is a powerful tool in any effort to improve health and wellbeing. But science—no matter how strong its findings—does not speak for itself.
Presentation
Building demand for equity and prevention
The Centre for Community Child Health has been a leader in framing for in Australia since 2010. This presentation summarizes the Centre's work in shaping the public conversation about early...
Publication
Connections and Communities: Reframing How We Talk About Opportunity Youth
Everyone wants young people to thrive and be active and engaged members of their communities as they become adults. But deeply rooted, often-negative assumptions about young people can make this...